Since for most of us our homes represent our biggest asset, that’s pretty good news when you consider how bleak things looked back in March of 2009.  Just think of how you were feeling about your 401(k)s.

But before you break out the champagne, consider that national home prices have now “recovered” to levels last seen in Autumn 2003.  That’s over six years of appreciation wiped out.

The San Francisco Metropolitan Statistical Area (that’s 5 of the 9 Bay Area Counties, folks) is up 15.2% from its trough value. Case-Shiller does not break out San Francisco proper from the much larger MSA.  However, I calculate that median prices in January were up just 10% from the lows reached in March 2009.  (I use 3 month moving averages, which approximates the seasonal adjustments the CS Index uses.)  To see how SF did through 2009, check out my blog and charts here.

Catching up on the endless paper-work the other night, I came across that rare thing:  a property that sells twice in a relatively short time with no major renovations performed in the interim.

This “sales matching” technique is what the folks at Case-Shiller use to create their Indexes of property values across the country.  Part of the reason they can is that their indexes are generated for large Metropolitan Statistical Areas with lots of house sales.  And even so, they use a lot of fancy foot-work to “match up” properties.

So now comes 714 Duncan Street, a beautiful 2,000 sf view home on a steep hill with fantastic city views.  Listed at a disarming $1,195,000, it sold for $1,415,000 in January 2008.  That was pretty much the top of the market for Noe Valley.  (You can see the chart here.)

Fast-forward 18 months.  The same house sells for $1,095,000 in June 2009.   That’s a drop of  22.6%.  My analysis of all Noe Valley sales for the same period shows a drop of just under 25% for the same period.

There’s something of a “duh, so what” to this story.   But I’ve seen enough nay-sayers  (on other blogs, of course!) who argue that tracking statistical medians are meaningless that I thought it was worth posting this as a powerful—and sobering —  case to the contrary.

A front page article in the Business Section of last Wednesday’s New York Times, grimly entitled “An Upturn in Housing May be Reversing,” pulls together recent and contradictory data from various sources, including Case-Shiller, Moody’s, and The National Association of Realtors.  The conclusions are sobering.

There is a growing consensus that the positive national sales data that we’ve seen over the last few months is faltering.  Much of the recent activity, for example, was stimulated by the anticipated expiration of the “First Time Home-buyer Tax Credit,” originally set to expire in November, and now extended through April of next year.  Essentially, this means we’ve “borrowed” from future sales.

Also, despite some positive economic news and decent sales volumes, there’s been little improvement in sales prices because inventory levels – read “foreclosed properties” – remain so high.   Mary Maitland, VP of the S & P Index that publishes the Case-Shiller Index foresees a “W” pattern for the housing market, with prices this winter testing the lows we saw earlier in the spring.  Am I allowed to say “I told you so?”

The NY Times article has a cool interactive chart for specific MSA areas including “San Francisco” — remember this covers 5 of the 9 Bay Area Counties.

That was the title of an October 27 article in the New York Times, and, as one of my readers and clients pointed out, it’s what I’ve been tentatively suggesting as a possible scenario for this winter. See here, for example.

And, ironically, the gloomy head-line announced yet another “positive” month of data from the Case-Shiller Home Price Index. The little up-tick in the index from last month’s July data that I discussed as a possible “dead cat bounce” continued in August.

“San Francisco”  — remember, this is a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)  consisting of 5 of the 9 Bay Area Counties — improved 2.6% on a seasonally adjusted basis from July 09.  The New York Times has a cool inter-active chart that shows the CS Index for various MSA’s here.

So why so glum?  The NY Times article points to a number of factors that suggest the improvement may not continue:

• an unexpected fall in consumer confidence in October.
• the end of the stimulus provided by the first-time home-buyer tax credit (though there’s pressure to extend this).
• doubt about how long the The Fed will keep interest rates so low.

Especially troubling for California is “strong evidence that foreclosures may be spreading from sub-prime inland areas to the more exclusive coastal region.”

My view hasn’t changed.  If you’re thinking about buying, this is probably a good time to be out there looking, with a view to buying some time during the winter months when activity slows and prices tend to soften somewhat.  Nobody knows how long interest rates are going to remain low — and some economists think that they may well remain low for a while — but with the government having thrown so much money at the economy to keep us from the brink of disaster, it’s hard to argue that the long-term trend is going to be anything but up.

As for whether we’ve hit bottom yet, it’s anybody’s guess.  While Mr Case of Case-Shiller continues to think that the worst is over, the NY Times article quotes another eminent economist who thinks that the recent improvement in the CS Index is an aberration and who wouldn’t be surprised by another — if limited — down-leg.

It’s a fool’s game to try to time the market to the nth degree.  And in this environment, with so many contradictory signs pointing in so many directions, you might as well flip a coin, or an economist, and see whether he lands on his head or his arse.

Me, I’m dusting off my magic 8-ball.

At the end of last month, the media was full of Case-Shiller’s upbeat report on the national housing market for July 2009, its most recent reporting month. Three months of improving sales “continue to support an indication of stabilization in national real estate values,” according to the September Report.

Here’s the chart, by the way, which also shows that on a national basis we are back to Autumn 2003 price levels.

See that little up-tick at the very end of down side of the mountain?  That’s what every one is celebrating, folks.  Indeed, it’s hard not to laugh when the Report includes tortured phrases like “the rate of annual decline … seems to be decelerating”  or “all metro areas are showing an improvement in the annual rates of return, as seen through a moderation in their annual declines.” Whoopee!

Locally, “San Francisco” — keep in mind that for the CS Index, this means 5 of the 9 Bay Area Counties — posted its fifth straight gain, with a seasonally adjusted gain of 2.9% over June 09, which followed a seasonally adjusted gain of 3.2% in June over May.  Before you break out the champagne, “San Francisco” was still down 17.9% year over year.

This is now old news.  But in this Sunday’s New York Times, Mr. Shiller mused about what all this meant for the real estate market. The article is not a model of clarity, but Shiller’s conclusion is pretty stark:  “At the moment, it appears that the extreme ups and downs of the housing market have turned many Americans into housing speculators.”  He suggests that people are looking at the huge amount of money the fed is pumping into the system, the first-time home-buyer tax credits, and other short-term infusions, and basically “trying  to time their home-buying decisions” and thus artificially causing the spike in prices. Here’s the takeaway:   “The sudden turn could signal a new housing boom, but it is more likely just a sign of a period of higher short-run price volatility.”

Indeed, after noting that the recent change in direction in the CS Index is the sharpest he’s ever seen, he takes a look at the last time a similar turnaround occurred.  It was at the end of the last housing bust, after the 1990-91 recession.  Five years later, however, home prices were down 13.8% in inflation-adjusted terms from the highs they’d reached in the “turnaround” month.

Meanwhile, the stock market continues its giddy gains — perhaps for many of the same reasons as the housing market has bounced back.

Personally, I’m not terribly fond of cats, but if I owned one I’d be keeping it away from any open windows.

Case-Shiller published its closely watched indices yesterday.  Hooray! The broadest CS index shows that the rate of decline in the nation’s largest housing markets has reversed in recent months.  Now we’re only going down 16% year over year instead of 20%.

They also point out that we are now back to 2003 values, which also holds true of San Francisco.  Here’s my chart from an April blog:

Before you go out and celebrate, Case-Shiller has “San Francisco” down a whopping 26.1% year over year.  Why the quotes?  Because it’s really the “San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area” and it includes ALL of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Mateo, and … San Francisco County. That’s 5 counties folks, a factoid often omitted even by such august publications as the New York Times (see today’s front page article).

Now here’s the “good” news.  My data says that the San Francisco we live in was down “just” 5.7% in June 09 year over year for homes.  Take a look under the Market Trends tab for annual and monthly data for the City and specific MLS Districts.  (By contrast, condos are down 15% year over year.  That also happens to be how much they’re down from their all-time highs, which occurred right about a year ago.  See my previous post.