Dead Cat Bounce?

deadcatbounce

At the end of last month, the media was full of Case-Shiller’s upbeat report on the national housing market for July 2009, its most recent reporting month. Three months of improving sales “continue to support an indication of stabilization in national real estate values,” according to the September Report.

Here’s the chart, by the way, which also shows that on a national basis we are back to Autumn 2003 price levels.

Picture 3

See that little up-tick at the very end of down side of the mountain?  That’s what every one is celebrating, folks.  Indeed, it’s hard not to laugh when the Report includes tortured phrases like “the rate of annual decline … seems to be decelerating”  or “all metro areas are showing an improvement in the annual rates of return, as seen through a moderation in their annual declines.” Whoopee!

Locally, “San Francisco” — keep in mind that for the CS Index, this means 5 of the 9 Bay Area Counties — posted its fifth straight gain, with a seasonally adjusted gain of 2.9% over June 09, which followed a seasonally adjusted gain of 3.2% in June over May.  Before you break out the champagne, “San Francisco” was still down 17.9% year over year.

This is now old news.  But in this Sunday’s New York Times, Mr. Shiller mused about what all this meant for the real estate market. The article is not a model of clarity, but Shiller’s conclusion is pretty stark:  “At the moment, it appears that the extreme ups and downs of the housing market have turned many Americans into housing speculators.”  He suggests that people are looking at the huge amount of money the fed is pumping into the system, the first-time home-buyer tax credits, and other short-term infusions, and basically “trying  to time their home-buying decisions” and thus artificially causing the spike in prices. Here’s the takeaway:   “The sudden turn could signal a new housing boom, but it is more likely just a sign of a period of higher short-run price volatility.”

Indeed, after noting that the recent change in direction in the CS Index is the sharpest he’s ever seen, he takes a look at the last time a similar turnaround occurred.  It was at the end of the last housing bust, after the 1990-91 recession.  Five years later, however, home prices were down 13.8% in inflation-adjusted terms from the highs they’d reached in the “turnaround” month.

Meanwhile, the stock market continues its giddy gains — perhaps for many of the same reasons as the housing market has bounced back.

Personally, I’m not terribly fond of cats, but if I owned one I’d be keeping it away from any open windows.

Did you like this? Share it:
This entry was posted in Economy, Market news and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Dead Cat Bounce?

  1. Jean-Claude says:

    I must say your blog posts are elegant pieces of prose. I understand why they are not so forthcoming. It’s clear you think before you write, and then think about what you write. Truly a rare talent in the world of blogs. Thanks and please know at least 1 Sydneysider (partly San franciscan) does read them religously

  2. X-Man says:

    Ah ha. I agree with the analysis and the comment (the first one, since you should not count yours as a comment). People get back in these markets since the rates are so great 0.75% for a CD you might as well get back in there. Commercial meltdown is next… Although some claim there is nowhere close to the amount of residential RE inventory, we shall see. Do cats once they bounced make a crater?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *