<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beautiful Wreck:  587 Jersey, Noe Valley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/2009/09/06/beautiful-wreck-587-jersey-noe-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/2009/09/06/beautiful-wreck-587-jersey-noe-valley/</link>
	<description>The Dirt on San Francisco Real Estate -  (Broker, Cal. Dept. Real Estate License No. 773349)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Misha</title>
		<link>http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/2009/09/06/beautiful-wreck-587-jersey-noe-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Misha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/?p=467#comment-525</guid>
		<description>My guess is they&#039;ll at least double the square footage and I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll cost them $500 for each of those extra feet.  If it&#039;s an owner/user and they end up with a beautiful 2600 sf.  house for say another $900k in, they&#039;ll have bought for around $615 per foot, which is good by Noe standards.  If it&#039;s a contractor aiming to spin, you can knock 30% off that, and there&#039;s a nice little profit.  You&#039;re right about demolition in SF.  But here, they&#039;ll keep the gorgeous facade and build everything up behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is they&#8217;ll at least double the square footage and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll cost them $500 for each of those extra feet.  If it&#8217;s an owner/user and they end up with a beautiful 2600 sf.  house for say another $900k in, they&#8217;ll have bought for around $615 per foot, which is good by Noe standards.  If it&#8217;s a contractor aiming to spin, you can knock 30% off that, and there&#8217;s a nice little profit.  You&#8217;re right about demolition in SF.  But here, they&#8217;ll keep the gorgeous facade and build everything up behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude</title>
		<link>http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/2009/09/06/beautiful-wreck-587-jersey-noe-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pegasusventures.net/wordpressblog/?p=467#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Now you can safely assume you&#039;ll be spending $500 a foot (at least) to make it pretty again, so for a total price of between 1.3-1.5m. is this a good deal for a house in Noe valley. The real trick would be to use the opportunity to make it bigger? It would be a labour of love though. At least in SF they will not let you demolish and built Lofts there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you can safely assume you&#8217;ll be spending $500 a foot (at least) to make it pretty again, so for a total price of between 1.3-1.5m. is this a good deal for a house in Noe valley. The real trick would be to use the opportunity to make it bigger? It would be a labour of love though. At least in SF they will not let you demolish and built Lofts there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
